The debate about the opportunity to work towards the emergence of a system of “flexicurity” is in fact structured around the opposition between two major options. The first one attempts to implement an “ideal” capitalism, made of individuals become independent by the possession of sufficient allocations in different “capitals”. The second one refers instead to a vision that can be advantageously compared to that of J.R. Commons when he imagined the ways to implement a “reasonable” capitalism.
Christophe Lavialle, Socio-Économie du Travail n°34 (Économies et Sociétés, tome XLVI), juin 2012, p.1241-1268.
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
secretariat3 (21 mai 2011). Flexicurity Projects: “Ideal” capitalism vs “reasonable” capitalism? Socio-économie du travail. Consulté le 18 mai 2026 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/ub2t